Vocabulary knowledge Among English Majors in a Saudi Arabia University

Main Article Content

Jamilah Maflah Alharbi

Abstract

One of the main challenges that learners may encounter in learning a foreign language is vocabulary. Vocabulary is defined as a mandatory part of language use because lack of vocabulary knowledge (VK) for learners has led to difficulties in the process of learning such language. This study sets out to assess the receptive and productive VK of first-year English major students. The researcher conducted the study on 65 students from Majmaah University who were made up of first-year English major students. The instruments used in the study were the Receptive Vocabulary Levels Test (VLT) by Nation and Schmitt et al. (2001) and the Productive VLT by Nation & Laufer (1999) The VLTs were used to assess the participants’ receptive and productive VK respectively. The findings of this study reveal that the productive VK of male students is significantly lower at the 3,000 word level compared to the 1,000 word level. This study fills the gap of knowledge regarding gender differences in acquiring receptive and productive vocabulary among Saudi EFL learners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Alharbi, J. M. (2021). Vocabulary knowledge Among English Majors in a Saudi Arabia University. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 24(1), 769–784. Retrieved from https://www.techniumscience.com.techniumscience.pluscommunication.eu/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/4710
Section
Linguistics

References

Al-fahadi, A. (2014). Saudi teachers’ views on appropriate cultural models for EFL textbooks: Insights into TESOL teachers’ management of global cultural flows and local realities in their teaching worlds (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). , Exeter, UK: University of Exeter.

Al-hazmi, S. (1993). English and Arabization: Friends or Foes?: The Saudi Experience. 8th English Southeast Asia Conference. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya.

Alkubaidi, M. A. (2014). The Relationship between Saudi English Major University Students’ Writing Performance and Their Learning Style and Strategy Use, 7(4). http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n4p83.

Almutairi, N. H. (2008). The influence of educational and sociocultural factors on the learning styles and strategies of female students in Saudi Arabia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. Al-Nasser, A.S. (2015). Problems of English language acquisition in Saudi Arabia: An exploratory-cum-remedial study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5 (8), pp. 1612-1619.

Al-Nofaie, H. (2010). The attitudes of teachers and students towards using Arabic in EFL classrooms in Saudi Public schools. A case study. Vol 4 no.1, pp 64-95.

Al-Nujaidi, A.H. (2003). The relationship between vocabulary size, reading strategies, and reading comprehension of efl learners in saudi Arabia. Retrieved from https://shareok.org/ bitstream/handle/ 11244/44607/ Thesis-2003D-A452r.pdf?sequence =1&isAllowed=y on April 5, 2017.

Al-Otaibi, G. (2004). Language learning strategy use among Saudi EFL students and its relationship to language proficiency level, gender and motivation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, US.

Baker, D (1998) Vocabulary acquisition: Research bases ,what reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Baniabdelrahman, A. A., & Al-shumaimeri, Y. (2014). Strategies Used by Saudi EFL Students to Determine the Meaning of English Words, 7(1), 75–92. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n1p75.

Chen, Z.&Truscott (2010). Cooperation-based Chinese L2 writing instruction: A spiral approach. Published doctoral dissertation. Ohio: Ohio State University.

Chung, T., & Nation, I.S.P. (2003). Technical vocabulary in specialised texts. Reading in a Foreign Language, 15(2), pp. 103-116 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl.

Cobb, T. (2007). Learning about language and learners from computer programs.

Da Silva, L.G. (2016). Academic vocabulary: A corpus linguistic study on how Brazilian students write academic English. A Master Thesis, University of Warwick.

Edelenbos, P., & Vinjé, M. (2000). The assessment of a foreign language at the end of primary (elementary) education. Language Testing, 17, 144-162.

Hall, L. (2000). Understanding the silence: Struggling readers discuss decisions about reading expository text. The Journal of Educational Research, 100, 132-141

Irvin, J. (1990) Vocabulary knowledge: Guidelines for instruction. What research says to the teacher? West Haven, CT: NEA Professional Library.

Jiménez, R. M., & Terrazas, M. (2005-2008). The receptive vocabulary of EFL young learners. Journal of English Studies, 5-6, 173-191.

Jiménez, R. M., & Moreno, S. (2004). L2 word associations and the variable sex: An outline according to an electronic tool. In A. R. Celada, D. Pastor, & P. J. García (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th International AEDEAN Conference. Salamanca: Editorial Ambos Mundos (CDRom format).

Jiménez, R. M., & Ojeda, J. (2009). Girls’ and boys’ lexical a-Availability in EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 158, 57-76.

Jiménez, R. M. (ed.) (2010). Gender perspectives on vocabulary in foreign and second language. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

Joshi, R. M. (2005).Vocabulary a critical component of comprehension, Relationship between meaning vocabulary and comprehension. Readingand Writing Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Ltd., 209-219. Retrieved July 18, 2006 From EBSCOhost, Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC).

Krashen , D. (1989) .We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal ; 73: 440-464.

Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). A computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.

Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension? In C. Lauren & L. nordman (Eds.), Special language: From humans thinking to thinking machines (pp.316-326). Clevedon, UK: multilingual Matters.

Laufer, B. (1990). "Sequence" and "order" in the development of L2 lexis: Some evidence from lexical confusions. Applied Linguistics, 11, 281-296.

Laufer, B. (1998). The Development of Passive and Active Vocabulary in a Second Language : Same or Different? Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 255–271.

Laufer, B., & Paribakht, T. S. (1998). The relationship between passive and active vocabularies: Effects of language learning context. Language Learning 48(3), 365-391.

laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing Vocabulary Knowledge: Size, Strength, and Computer Adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399-436.

Meara, P. (2005 ). Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. Language Teaching and Linguistics Abstracts, 13, 221-246.

Ministry of Education (2005). Educational Reform: Proposals and Recommendations.

Lusaka: Ministry of Education.

Nation, I.S.P. (1983). Testing and teaching vocabulary. Guidelines, 5(1), 12-25.

Nation, I.S.P. (1990). Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.

Nation, I.S.P. & Beglar, D. (2000). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9-13.

Nyikos, M. (1990). Sex-related differences in adult language learning: Socialization and memory factors. Modern Language Journal, 74, 273-287.

Optiz, M. and Moses, L. (2009). Comprehension and English Language Learners: 25 Oral Reading Strategies That Cross Proficiency Levels. Heinemann.

Pardo, L. S. (1988). What every teacher needs to know about comprehension. Retrieved from Ebsco Host Academic Search Premier Database.

Qin, C. (2012). Didactic considerations of vocabulary breadth and depth in EFL/ESL contexts: A literature review. Retrieved on May 26, 2016 from.

Richards, J.C. (1990). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly 10, 77–89.

Rosni,S. (2009). Isu Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Malaysia. Nilai: Penerbit USIM.

Samuels, S. J. (1994). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading, revisited. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, and H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55-88.

Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64:4 (December), pp.913–951.

Sunderland, J. (2010). Theorizing gender perspectives in foreign and second language learning. In R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Ed.), Gender perspectives on vocabulary in foreign and second languages (pp. 1-22).

Thorndike, E. L, & Lorge, I. (1944). The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teacher's College, Columbia University.

Webb, S. (2005). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. SSLA, 27, pp.33–52.

Woolley, G. (2010). A Multiple Strategy Framework Supporting Vocabulary Development for Students with Deficits. A Australian Journal of Special Education, 34(2), 119-132.

Zhong, H.(2016). The relationship between receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge: A perspective from vocabulary use in sentence writing. The Language Learning Journal, 1736(April), pp. 1–17. doi:10.1080/09571736.2015.1127403.

Similar Articles

<< < 260 261 262 263 264 265 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.