State administrative assets report as sufficient preliminary evidence in the crime of corruption

Main Article Content

Nur Chusniah
Sudarsono
I Nyoman Nurjaya
Abdul Madjid

Abstract

The type of research used in this research is normative legal research. The State Organizing Assets Report as an administrative document can be used as a legal document as sufficient initial evidence in a criminal act of corruption. Sufficient preliminary evidence is interpreted as a minimum of 2 (two) pieces of evidence as stipulated in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, namely witness statements, expert statements, letters, instructions and statements of the defendant.  The State Organizing Assets Report is an extension of documentary evidence considering that the State Organizing Assets Report is made according to the provisions of the law, is required to be reported to the Corruption Eradication Commission and those who don’t comply are subject to sanctions and are intended to prove a thing or condition so that it meets the criteria for the instrument documentary evidence as referred to in Article 187 letter d of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nur Chusniah, Sudarsono, I Nyoman Nurjaya, & Abdul Madjid. (2021). State administrative assets report as sufficient preliminary evidence in the crime of corruption. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 24(1), 291–295. Retrieved from https://www.techniumscience.com.techniumscience.pluscommunication.eu/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/4768
Section
Law

References

Adji, I. S. (2012). Korupsi dan Permasalahannya. Diadit Media.

Atmasasmita, R. (n.d.). Sekitar Masalah Korupsi Aspek Nasional dan Aspek International. Mandar Maju.

Bank), B. D. (The W. (2003). Memerangi Korupsi di Indonesia. Kantor Bank Dunia.

Bondarenko, O. S., Utkina, M. S., & Kolesnikova, M. V. (2021). The role of mass media in preventing corruption. Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicacoes, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v13i1.35433

Dadgostari, F., Guim, M., Beling, P. A., Livermore, M. A., & Rockmore, D. N. (2021). Modeling law search as prediction. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09261-5

Dkk, M. N. A. (2016). Anotasi Pemikiran Hukum (Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum). Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Lubach, R. D. (2016). Aardbevingsschade en het aansprakelijkheidsrecht: over vergoeding van waardevermindering en omkering van de bewijslast. Maandblad Voor Vermogensrecht, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.5553/mvv/157457672016014002004

Makarova, M. (2021). The Anti-Corruption Civil Society in Sweden as Part of Sustainable Policy Networks. Regional Formation and Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.15181/rfds.v26i3.1812

Michael, T. (2020). Requirements for Death in Dismissal of Constitutional Justices. Research, Society and Development, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9458

Paparinskis, M. (2020). The Once and Future Law of State Responsibility. American Journal of International Law, 114(4). https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2020.60

Peltier-Rivest, D. (2018). A model for preventing corruption. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(2), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2014-0048

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.