The Thematic Content Short Course Model for Accelerating Language Proficiency Among Learners of German and Mandarin Language and Literature: An Experimental Study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Language learning, particularly foreign languages, is not always appealing or effective for the general public, especially when the available time is limited and expectations include both engagement and practical competency tailored to specific needs. This study aims to produce a viable instructional module to introduce foreign languages, specifically German and Mandarin, to the general public in the form of a short course. This research falls into the research and development category, with effectiveness determined not only through expert validation but also by measuring its impact via a pre-test and post-test experimental design. A total of 10 beginner learners participated in the short course. Data were analyzed using content analysis, examining qualitative data gathered from learner feedback, comments, and suggestions on the short course to identify themes and patterns that could inform the development of the short course model. The results indicate that the developed short course model of the themes ‘sich vorstellen’ (perkenalan), ‘Familie’ (Keluarga), ‘Alltagsleben’ (kehidupan sehari-hari), ‘Essen und Trinken’ (makanan dan minuman), and ‘Das Hobby’ (hobi) can significantly enhance learner competency. The most effective components in boosting learner competency were practical training, group discussions, and feedback. Furthermore, the findings demonstrate that the developed short course model increases learners' motivation and self-confidence.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
L. Lukman and C. S. Widyastuti, “Bahasa Indonesia Sebagai Produk Budaya dan Bagian Dari Bahasa Austronesia: Suatu Tinjauan Linguistik Historis Komparatif,” Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2024.
F. D. Cindy and R. Rosyidah, “Bahasa Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Jerman Di SMA,” prosodi, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 119–130, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.21107/prosodi.v14i2.8763.
A. Balconi and E. Spitzman, “Content Area Teacher’s Challenges Writing Language Objectives: A Document Analysis,” TESOL Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.530.
O. Liamkina and M. Ryshina-Pankova, “Grammar Dilemma: Teaching Grammar as a Resource for Making Meaning,” Modern Language Journal, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 270–289, 2012.
C. A. Xavier, “Teaching Grammar as Meaning-Making in the Writing Class: An Inclusive Approach,” TET, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 110–119, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.52696/RGCA3593.
J. Atkinson, “Reflections on Technology, Change and Academic Libraries,” Scientific Research, pp. 185–193, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822807-4.00018-X.
R. Musdalifah, “Pemrosesan dan Penyimpanan Informasi pada Otak Anak dalam Belajar: Short Term and Long Term Memory,” alishlah, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 217–235, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.35905/alishlah.v17i2.1163.
X. Zhou, Q. Li, D. Xu, X. Li, and C. Fischer, “College online courses have strong design in scaffolding but vary widely in supporting student agency and interactivity,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 58, p. 100912, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2023.100912.
H. Nastiti and R. Rosyidah, “Cross-Cultural Aspects of Familie Theme in Learning German as a Foreign Language for Grade XI of Senior High School,” DaFIna, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 87, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.17977/um079v6i22022p87-97.
K. Kusnandar, “Pengembangan Bahan Belajar Digital Learning Object,” Teknodik, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 583–595, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.32550/teknodik.v0i0.69.
D. N. Aini and A. P. K. Kirana, “Interaktivitas Game Animasi Penunjang Keterampilan Berbahasa Asing,” ED, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1313–1324, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.31004/edukatif.v5i3.5011.
T. Aichner, M. Grünfelder, O. Maurer, and D. Jegeni, “Twenty-Five Years of Social Media: A Review of Social Media Applications and Definitions from 1994 to 2019,” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 215–222, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0134.
D. N. Aini and D. Syafruddin, “Pencitraan Bangsa Jerman Dalam Novel “Generation Golf",” Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya, vol. 41, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Aug. 2013.
J. W. Creswell and J. W. Creswell, Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches, 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2013.
D. N. Aini, A. Winarno, and A. A. Rahman, “Supporting the Quality Culture of Education through the Design of an Information Technology System for Accurate Management Services at Pondok An-Nahdloh Selangor,” West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 02, no. 10, pp. 1951–1962, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v2i10.1330.
I. G. A. K. L. Absari, I. N. Sudiana, and I. W. Wendra, “Penilaian Autentik Guru Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Pembelajaran Menulis Siswa Kelas VII Di SMP Negeri 1 Singaraja,” Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Undiksha, vol. 3, no. 1, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpbs.v3i1.4771.
Muliana, “Pelaksanaan Penilaian Autentik Dalam Pembelajaran Teks Eksposisi Pada Sma Di Kota Banda Aceh,” Master Bahasa, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 161–170, 2018.
M. Kröll, Beurteilung der Gruppen-und Teamarbeit aus einzelwirtschaftlicher Sicht., H. (eds) Lernen der Organisation durch Gruppen-und Teamarbeit. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1997. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59169-3_10
R. E. Slavin, “Cooperative Learning and Academic Achievement: Why Does Groupwork Work?. [Aprendizaje cooperativo y rendimiento académico: ¿por qué funciona el trabajo en grupo?],” analesps, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 785–791, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.6018/analesps.30.3.201201.
M. Hassanzadeh and S. Fotoohnejad, “Implementing An Automated Feedback Program for A foreign Language Writing Course: A Learner-Centric Study,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1494–1507, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12587.