State university faculty performance-based evaluation system with data graph analysis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study presents the design and development of a State University Faculty Performance-Based Evaluation System with Data Graph Analysis, aimed at addressing the limitations of traditional and semi-digital evaluation methods used in higher education institutions. Existing systems, such as manual evaluations and third-party tools like Google Forms, often suffer from inefficiency, limited data analysis, and issues in confidentiality and accessibility. The proposed system integrates a centralized database, secure two-factor authentication, dynamic questionnaires, automated report generation, and stakeholder-specific dashboards to streamline faculty evaluations. A key innovation is the incorporation of data graph analysis, enabling administrators to visualize performance trends, identify strengths and weaknesses, and make evidence-based decisions on faculty development, research, and extension activities. The system was evaluated using usability, reliability, interactivity, and security criteria, yielding excellent results based on stakeholder testing. By institutionalizing a secure, transparent, and data-driven evaluation process, this project provides a sustainable framework for enhancing faculty performance management and supporting continuous academic improvement in State Universities and Colleges. In addition, the system ensures compliance with data privacy requirements by securing sensitive information through advanced authentication and backup mechanisms. Its user-friendly interface and responsive design allow accessibility across multiple devices, promoting inclusivity among stakeholders such as students, peers, supervisors, and administrators. The generated visual reports serve as a valuable reference for policy formulation, strategic planning, and targeted faculty training. Furthermore, the project emphasizes the importance of shifting from compliance-based evaluation toward a culture of continuous improvement, accountability, and innovation. Overall, this capstone underscores the role of technology-driven evaluation systems in shaping quality assurance and academic excellence in higher education.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1] Adelia et al. (2021). The Role of Google Form as an Assessment Tool in ELT: Critical Review of Literature. Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, Volume 1, No.1, 2021. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v1i1.49
[2]Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020).
Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
[3]Al Sherideh, A. S., Maabreh, K. S., Maabreh, M., & Al Mousa, M. R. (2023). Assessing the impact and effectiveness of cybersecurity measures in e learning on students and educators: A case study. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 14(5), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140516
[3] Alger, W., Doan, M., & Caporusso, N. (2024). Student Evaluations of Teaching: Using Big Data Visualization to Explore Challenges and Opportunities. 2024 47th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO), 508–513. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIPRO60963.2024.10569773
[4] Alix, A. L., Datul, D. J., Fernando-Raguro, M., Lagman, A. C., & Adao, R. T. (2022). Faculty Evaluation System Platform with Decision Support Mechanism. 2022 10th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIET55102.2022.9779033
[5] Aparicio, A., Martínez-González, M. M., & Cardeñoso-Payo, V. (2023). App-based detection of vulnerable implementations of OTP SMS APIs in the banking sector. Wireless Networks, 29(7), 6451-6464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-023-03455-w
[6] Araki, T., Furukawa, J., Ohara, K., Pinkas, B., Rosemarin, H., & Tsuchida, H. (2021). Secure graph analysis at scale. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 610–629). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3460120.3484560
[7] Barker, E. (2020). Recommendation for key management: Part 1 – General (NIST Special Publication 800 57 Part 1 Revision 5). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-57pt1r5
[8] Benosa, B., & Oñate, J. J. (2023). Design and development of faculty performance evaluation system (FPES) v2.0. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2602, 030020. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0124077
[9] Bhavimane, Adarsh et al. (2024). Data Visualization in Education: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT). Volume 4, Issue 7, May 2024. DOI:10.48175/IJARSCT-18676
[10] Caballero, K. C. M., & Magno, J. T. (2023). Integrating data analytics into online faculty performance evaluation system. Philippine Information Technology Journal, 16(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.56901/kxpw6512
[11] Cieslak, V., & Valor, C. (2024). Moving beyond conventional resistance and resistors: An integrative review of employee resistance to digital transformation. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2442550
[12] Cinizan, J., & Valdez, H. E. (2023). Enhanced Faculty Performance Evaluation System with Data Analytics. E-DAWA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.56901/KXPW6512
[13] Cui, Y., Song, X., Hu, Q., Li, Y., Shanthini, A., & Vadivel, T. (2021). Big data visualization using multimodal feedback in education. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 96, 107544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107544
[14] Daluyon, J. A., & Zamora, M. A. M. (2024). Design and Development of Student Evaluation System for Faculty Performance in University of Rizal System. (2024). Journal of Innovative Technology Convergence, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.69478/JITC2024v6n4a02
[15] De Jesus, N. M., & Buenas, L. J. E. (2023). Descriptive Analytics and Interactive Visualizations for Performance Monitoring of Extension Services Programs, Projects, and Activities. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140173
[16] Dela Fuente, Romel O., & Dela Fuente, Rodelio O. (2022). Faculty Performance Evaluation System with Application of Data Analytics. South Asian Journal of Engineering Technology, 121(2022) 24-31. https://doi.org/10.26524/sajet.2022.12.05
[17] Ferrer, V. C. (2022). Performance of Teacher Education Institutions in State Universities and Colleges of Region IV-B: Basis for sustainable accreditation plan. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2022.v02i06.005
[18] Google. (2025). Google Forms. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from https://www.google.com/forms/about/
[19] Horak, T., Aigner, W., Brehmer, M., Joshi, A., & Tominski, C. (2021). Responsive visualization design for mobile devices. In Mobile Data Visualization (Chap. 2, pp. 33–66). Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003090823-2
[20] Kim, H., & Park, S. (2025). Bio-2FA-IoD: A biometric-enhanced two-factor authentication protocol for secure Internet of Drones operations. Mathematics, 13(13), 2177. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13132177
[21] Khtere, A. (2020). Performance appraisal of faculty members based on internal quality assurance system: A Delphi study. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n6p87
[22] Kobi, J. (2024). Developing dashboard analytics and visualization tools for effective performance management and continuous process improvement. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(5), 1697–1707. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY1147
[22] Lin, Q., Zhu, Y., Lu, H., Shi, K., & Niu, Z. (2021). Improving University Faculty Evaluations via Multi-view Knowledge Graph. Future Generation Computer Systems, 117, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.11.021
[23] Nelson, E. S., & Chatfield, S. L. (2022). A Conversation in Time: A New Concept for Creating Stream Graphs for Qualitative Data Visualization. The Qualitative Report, 27(11), 2605–2622. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5713
[24] Oluwadele, D., Singh, Y., & Adeliyi, T. T. (2023). E-Learning Performance Evaluation in Medical Education—A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis. Healthcare, 11(2), 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11020232
[25] OpenEduCat. (2025). OpenEduCat: Open source school management software. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from https://www.openeducat.org/
[26] Ordoñez-Avila, R., Salgado Reyes, N., Meza, J., & Ventura, S. (2023). Data mining techniques for predicting teacher evaluation in higher education: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 9(3), e13939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13939
[27] Patimo, D. (2020). Faculty Performance Evaluation System of State Universities and Colleges in the Philippine Eastern Visayas Region. JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation, 6(2), 159 167. https://doi.org/10.21009/JISAE.062.06
[28] Rahmatollahi, M., & Mohamadi Zenouzagh, Z. (2021). Designing and validating an evaluation inventory for assessing teachers’ professional accountability. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00128-3
[29] Republic Act No. 10173, Data Privacy Act of 2012. (2012, August 15). Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/08/15/republic-act-no-10173/
[30] Santillan, K. M. (2024). Streamlining Faculty Evaluations: A Web-Based System for Enhanced Efficiency and Data-Driven Insights. Journal of Innovative Technology Convergence, 6(2), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.69478/JITC2024v6n002a04
[31] School Improvement Network. (2025). Observation 360. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from https://www.schoolimprovement.com/products/observation-360/
[32] Segun Falade, O. D., Osundare, O. S., Kedi, W. E., Okeleke, P. A., Ijomah, T. I., & Abdul Azeez, O. Y. (2024). Developing cross platform software applications to enhance compatibility across devices and systems. Computer Science & IT Research Journal, 5(8), 2040–2061. https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v5i8.1491
[33] Sidapara, K. (2025). UI/UX design: Principles, trends, and best practices. ResearchGate Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20539.53289
[34] Santillan, K. M. L. (2024). Streamlining faculty evaluations: A web-based system for enhanced efficiency and data-driven insights. Journal of Innovative Technology Convergence, 6(2), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.69478/JITC2024v6n002a04
[35] Shea, K., St Cyr, O., & Chau, T. (2022). Evaluation of an ecological interface design–driven augmentative and alternative communication interface. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering, 9, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/15553434221078215
[36] TeacherEase. (n.d.). TeacherEase: Cloud-hosted solution for K–12 schools. Common Goal Systems. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from https://www.teacherease.com/
[37] Wang, J., Zhang, H., Li, R., & Zhao, Y. (2024). Enhancing employee performance appraisal through data mining: Minimizing manual errors and promoting transparency. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 77553. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77553-w
[38] Xin, X., Shu-Jiang, Y., Nan, P., ChenXu, D., & Dan, L. (2022). Review on A big data-based innovative knowledge teaching evaluation system in universities. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(3), 100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100197
[39] Zhou, Y., & Yang, S. (2024). Design of an integrated evaluation system for innovative education in colleges and universities based on the gray comprehensive evaluation method. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-0120
[40] Zou, S., Sun, H., Xu, G., Xu, C., Quan, R., & others. (2023). A robust continuous authentication system using smartphone sensors and Wasserstein generative adversarial networks. Security and Communication Networks, 2023, Article 3673113. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3673113