Analysis of alternative selection for vertical clearance design under Tabalong Bridge of PT Adaro Indonesia

Main Article Content

Diean Oktavian Regar
Aqli Mursadin

Abstract

PT Adaro Indonesia is trying to adjust a vertical clearance under Tabalong Bridge 1 (unloaded) and Tabalong Bridge 2 (loaded) because the existing conditions still apply a minimum vertical clearance of 4 m. I t should be in accordance with latest Regulation of the Minister of Public Works No. 19/PRT/M/2011 that for vertical clearance above national road at least 5.1 m. This specification has not been met by the national road under the Tabalong 1 & 2 Bridges bec ause both bridges were built in the 90s. Therefore we need an engineering technique to overcome this. There are 2 alternative designs, namely lowering the elevation of the national road and increasing the elevation of the bridge's upper structure to mitiga te oversized vehicles so as not to hit the lower structure of the Tabalong bridge. In determining the selection of the best alternative designs in this research is based on two (2) things, non financial criteria with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and financial criteria with Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA)/Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) method. This study uses a survey method by distributing questionnaires and interviews as a means of collecting primary data. In addition, previous research and consultant DED documents were used as a means of collecting secondary data. The AHP method is used to process primary data to produce a decision from a non financial aspect. While the LCC/BCR method is used to process secondary data to produce a decision from the financi al aspect . The results of the AHP analysis obtained that the synthesis value of the decision the option of lowering national roads was 85% and the bridge lifting option was 15% and the consistency ratio (CR) was 0.05 < 0.1. The consistency ratio below 0.1 shows that the questionnaire data from the respondents are consistent. The results of the analysis of Life Cycle Cost (LCC) obtained the option of lowering national roads where the LCC value is Rp. 44,877,651,669.27 more economical than the bridge lifting option. Then the results of the Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) analysis obtained the option of lowering national roads with a BCR value of 2.33 > 1 and NPV = Rp. 43,442,264,804.34 > 1 means that the option lowering national roads is feasible. While the bridge li fting option is obtained by analyzing the value of BCR = 0.98 < 1 and NPV = option is not feasible to implement.


img1.jpg


Article Details

How to Cite
Regar, D. O., & Mursadin, A. (2022). Analysis of alternative selection for vertical clearance design under Tabalong Bridge of PT Adaro Indonesia. Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 4(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v4i1.5600
Section
Articles

References

Apriyanto, A. 2008. Perbandingan Kelayakan Jalan Beton dan Aspal dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro. Fify, H. 2002. Metode Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Konstruksi Jembatan. ilmutekniksipil.com. Hidayati, W., & Harjanto, B. 2001. Konsep Dasar Penilaian Properti. Yogyakarta: Edisi Pertama, BPFE-Yogyakarta. Kaufman, J. 2001. Value Management: Creating Competitive Advantage. Kaufman, J. 2002. Manajemen Nilai. Jakarta: Prenhallindo. Komite Penyusunan Standar Penilaian Indonesia. 2007. Standar Penilaian Indonesia. Jakarta: MAPPI. Mintarsyah, H. 2012. Analisa Penggunaan Tertinggi dan Terbaik pada Lahan Bekas Terminal Sungailiat di Kabupaten Bangka. Tesis, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya. Partovi, F. Y. 1994. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for ABC Analysis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. Pembangunan, P. P. 2008. Buku Referensi untuk Kontraktor Bangunan Gedung dan Sipil. Pujawan, I. N. 2004. Ekonomi Teknik. Surabaya: Edisi Pertama Cetakan Kedua, Guna Wijaya. Saaty, T. L. 1993. Jakarta: PT. Pustaka Binaman Pressindo. Saaty, T. L. 2001. Decision Making for Leaders Vo. II of the AHP Series. Utomo Christiono, P. a. 2009. Value-based Group Decision on Support Bridge Selection. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering. Zahedi, F. 1986. The Analytic Hierarchy Process - A Survey of the Method and its Applications. Interfaces. Nugroho, W. P. 2014. Analisa Biaya Pada Pemilihan Alternatif Alat Pemeliharaan Jalan di BBPJN V Surabaya Dengan Metode Life Cycle Cost. Tesis, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya.Saaty, T. L. 2001. Decision Making for Leaders Vo. II of the AHP Series. Ridhawati, E. 2016. Penggunaan Analitical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Dalam Menentukan Prioritas Pengembangan Industri Kecil dan Menengah di Kecamatan Bandar Negeri Suoh Kabupaten Lampung Barat , Jurnal TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) Volume 6. Chumaidi, M. 2017. Implementasi Value Based Decision Pada Pemilihan Metode Kerja Ereksi Girder Pada Pekerjaan Jembatan Kali Marmoyo Berdasarkan Kriteria Finansial dan Non – Finansial. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya. Anwar, M. H. 2018. Penerapan Analitical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Dalam Penyusunan Skala Prioritas Untuk Menjaga Kinerja Saluran Irigasi (Studi Kasus Saluran Induk Mataram di D.I Yogyakarta. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta. Kementrian PUPR. 2017. Modul 3 Kelayakan Ekonomi. Bandung: Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pusat Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Sumber Daya Air dan Konstruksi. Kementerian PUPR. 2011. Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor 19/PRT/M/2011 tentang Persyaratan Teknis Jalan dan Kriteria Perencanaan Teknis Jalan. Jakarta. Adaro Jasabara Indonesia. 2021. Laporan Review Study Comparison Raise Up Haul Road Bridge and Lowering National Road Adaro Indonesia. Jakarta. Vanya, G. V. 2020. Analisis Penentuan Pondasi Jembatan Untuk Kemudahan Pelaksanaan di Lapangan Dengan Metode Rekayasa Nilai (Studi Kasus Pada Jembatan Sungai Temunih II Kecamatan Kusan Hulu Kabupaten Tanah Bumbu). Tesis, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin. Bank Indonesia. 2021. Data Inflasi. https://www.bi.go.id/id/statistik/indikator/data-inflasi.aspx (diakses pada tanggal 6 Desember 2021). Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. Suku Bunga Kredit Rupiah Menurut Kelompok Bank 2020. https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/13/383/2/suku-bunga-kredit-rupiah menurut-kelompok-bank.html (diakses pada tanggal 6 Desember 2021).

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.