Vanet performance evaluatıon ın terms of nodes dıstrıbutıon, mobılıty models, and routıng protocols
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Nowadays, Vehicle Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) have become a new trend and one of the most attractive areas of research. It has a wide range of applications such as smart cities and the Internet of Things (IoT). The main issue of the VANET networks is the limitation in network resources such as power, and memory. Moreover, since VANET nodes are dynamic and move over time, the connectivity of the networks is also considered an important issue. This paper designs experiments that reflect a variety of scenarios in VANET networks. Many issues and factors in VANET networks have also been investigated in this paper. There are many factors that affect the whole performance of VANET networks (i.e., mobility models, routing protocols, and things distribution) in terms of network resources. Therefore, this paper aims at testing different mobility models such as the Human Mobility model, Cauchy Flight Mobility model, and Correlated Directions Mobility model, and investigate their impact on the consumption of network resources under a particular routing protocol such as Spray and Wait routing protocol, Probabilistic Flooding routing protocol, and Epidemic routing protocol. In addition, testing different distributions such as Uniform distribution, Gaussian (Normal) distribution, and Power-Law distribution). The resources we plan to investigate are energy sources and the amount of data exchanged. In the designed experiments, each simulation includes a combination of a mobility model, nodes distribution, and a routing protocol. The findings showed that each mobility model, routing protocol, or distribution is effective in a particular application. As a result, it was found that determining the application of the VANET network is a crucial step before performing a simulation or designing a network.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Mahi, M. J. N., Chaki, S., Ahmed, S., Biswas, M., Kaiser, S., Islam, M. S., ... & Whaiduzzaman, M. (2022). A review on VANET research: Perspective of recent emerging technologies. IEEE Access.
Abdulkadhim, F. G., Yi, Z., Tang, C., Onaizah, A. N., & Ahmed, B. (2023). Design and development of a hybrid (SDN+ SOM) approach for enhancing security in VANET. Applied Nanoscience, 13(1), 799-810.
Chatterjee, T., Karmakar, R., Kaddoum, G., Chattopadhyay, S., & Chakraborty, S. (2022). A survey of VANET/V2X routing from the perspective of non-learning-and learning-based approaches. IEEE Access, 10, 23022-23050.
Al-Ani, R., Baker, T., Zhou, B., & Shi, Q. (2023). Privacy and safety improvement of VANET data via a safety-related privacy scheme. International Journal of Information Security, 1-21.
Sagaama, I., Kchiche, A., Trojet, W., & Kamoun, F. (2023). Energy consumption models in VANET simulation tools for electric vehicles: a literature survey. International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, 42(1), 30-46.
Monfared, S. K., & Shokrollahi, S. (2023). DARVAN: A fully decentralized anonymous and reliable routing for VANets. Computer Networks, 109561.
Shokrollahi, S., & Dehghan, M. (2023). TGRV: A trust-based geographic routing protocol for VANETs. Ad Hoc Networks, 140, 103062.
Ramya Devi, M., Jasmine Selvakumari Jeya, I., & Lokesh, S. (2023). Adaptive scheduled partitioning technique for reliable emergency message broadcasting in VANET for intelligent transportation systems. Automatika, 64(2), 341-354.
Sharif, A., Li, J. P., & Saleem, M. A. (2018). Internet of things enabled vehicular and ad hoc networks for smart city traffic monitoring and controlling: a review. International Journal of Advanced Networking and Applications, 10(3), 3833-3842.
Lee, E. K., Gerla, M., Pau, G., Lee, U., & Lim, J. H. (2016). Internet of Vehicles: From intelligent grid to autonomous cars and vehicular fogs. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 12(9), 1550147716665500.
Malik, Suman & Sahu, Prasant. (2019). A comparative study on routing protocols for VANETs. Heliyon. 5. e02340. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02340.
Wadullah, W. (2022). The Impact of the Relation Between Movement Patterns and Nodes Distribution on the Performance of Smart Cities.
Hasan, A. S. (2021). A Network-Based Model for Mitigating Traffic Jams in Road Networks.
Eze, Elias & Zhang, Sijing & Liu, Enjie. (2014). Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs): Current state, challenges, potentials and way forward. 176-181. 10.1109/IConAC.2014.6935482.
Paul, Anand & Chilamkurti, Naveen & Daniel, Alfred & Rho, Seungmin. (2017). Evaluation of vehicular network models. 10.1016/B978-0-12-809266-8.00004-1.
Malik, Suman & Sahu, Prasant. (2019). A comparative study on routing protocols for VANETs. Heliyon. 5. e02340. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02340.
Shrivastava, Prashant Kumar, and L. K. Vishwamitra. "Comparative analysis of proactive and reactive routing protocols in VANET environment." Measurement: Sensors 16 (2021): 100051.
Mahdi, Hussain Falih, Mohammed Salah Abood, and Mustafa Maad Hamdi. "Performance evaluation for vehicular ad-hoc networks based routing protocols." Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics 10.2 (2021): 1080-1091
Tomasini, M., Mahmood, B., Zambonelli, F., Brayner, A., & Menezes, R. (2017). On the effect of human mobility to the design of metropolitan mobile opportunistic networks of sensors. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 38, 215-232.
Mahmood, B. (2021, July). Indicators on the Feasibility of Curfew on Pandemics Outbreaks in Metropolitan/Micropolitan Cities. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite (COMNETSAT) (pp. 179-183). IEEE.
Mahmood, B. M., & Dabdawb, M. M. (2020). The pandemic COVID-19 infection spreading spatial aspects: A network-Based software approach. AL-Rafidain Journal of Computer Sciences and Mathematics, 14(1), 159-170.
Cheng, L., & Panichpapiboon, S. (2012). Effects of intervehicle spacing distributions on connectivity of VANET: a case study from measured highway traffic. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(10), 90-97.
Mahmood, B., & Menezes, R. (2016). The role of human relations and interactions in designing memory-related models for sensor networks. Sensors & Transducers, 199(4), 42-51.
Mahmood, B., Tomasini, M., & Menezes, R. (2015, February). Social-based Forwarding of Messages in Sensor Networks. In SENSORNETS (pp. 85-90).
Kim, C., Kumar, M., Kim, K., & Gowda, D. (2019, December). Power-law nonlinearity with maximally uniform distribution criterion for improved neural network training in automatic speech recognition. In 2019 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU)(pp. 988-995). IEEE.
Khan, M. F., & Das, I. (2021). Analysis of various mobility models and their impact on QoS in MANET. Computationally Intelligent Systems and their Applications, 131-141.
Song, C., Qu, Z., Blumm, N., & Barabási, A. L. (2010). Limits of predictability in human mobility. Science, 327(5968), 1018-1021.
Aljarah, R., & Mahmood, B. (2020, February). Towards the Impact of Mobility Patterns on Network Resources in Smart Cities. In 2020 6th International Engineering Conference “Sustainable Technology and Development"(IEC) (pp. 126-130). IEEE.
Alramli, T., Mahmood, B., & Kadhim, D. (2020, April). Network-Based Model for Dissemination of Advertising. In 2020 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (CSASE) (pp. 226-231). IEEE.
Da Silva, S., & Matsushita, R. (2016). The St. Petersburg paradox: an experimental solution. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 445, 66-74.
Allez, R., & Bouchaud, J. P. (2013). Eigenvectors dynamic and local density of states under free addition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.4939.
Vahdat, A., & Becker, D. (2000). Epidemic routing for partially connected ad hoc networks.
Yassein, M. B., & Khaoua, M. O. (2007). Applications of probabilistic flooding in MANETs. Ubiquitous Computing and Communication Journal, 1(1), 1-5.
Aljarah, R., & Mahmood, B. (2020, February). Towards the Impact of Mobility Patterns on Network Resources in Smart Cities. In 2020 6th International Engineering Conference “Sustainable Technology and Development"(IEC) (pp. 126-130). IEEE.
Al-Jarah, R. J., & Mahmood, B. M. (2020). The Impact of Mobility Models on the Consumption of Network Resources in the Internet of Things (IoT). AL-Rafidain Journal of Computer Sciences and Mathematics, 14(2), 51-69.
Salih Hasan, A., & Mahmood, B. M. (2022). Performance Evaluation of Vehicle Ad hoc Networks Under Wi-Fi-6 Technology. AL-Rafidain Journal of Computer Sciences and Mathematics, 16(1), 103-109.
Tisue, S., & Wilensky, U. (2004, May). Netlogo: A simple environment for modeling complexity. In International conference on complex systems (Vol. 21, pp. 16-21).
Tisue, S., & Wilensky, U. (2004, October). NetLogo: Design and implementation of a multi-agent modeling environment. In Proceedings of agent (Vol. 2004, pp. 7-9). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.